See articles: Brian D. Hill files petition in Virginia Supreme Court to put a stop to a Judicial Dictatorship being enacted all over Virginia; ALERT! FULL Virginia Appeals COURT ALLOWS a single judge to be a DICTATOR who can target appellants with unconstitutional CONTEMPT CHARGES to have Appeals THROWN OUT by USAGE OF LAWYERS APPOINTED by the same judge; and Brian D. Hill files Petition for Rehearing in Virginia Appeals Court arguing: “a CIRCUIT COURT aka the TRIAL COURT can engage in a DICTATORSHIP.” Constitutional Crisis in Virginia.
Author: Stanley Bolten
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News had participated in the oral argument in the Supreme Court of Virginia on August 28, 2024, to explain about the very important issue which will affect everybody in Virginia, every American citizen in America must be aware of what is happening. Judges (whether corrupt or not) can go after litigants including criminal defendants using the power of criminal contempt of court (Va. Code § 18.2-456) to suppress and thwart ongoing appeals and make them go away. Appeals are NOW BEING CRIMINALIZED. People will be afraid to appeal out of fear of facing any potential criminal contempt of court charge for “vile, contemptuous, or insulting language” even when such language is not a clear and present danger, not threatening in any way, and are not defamatory. Doesn’t matter. Appeals can now be targeted by circuit court judges in Virginia.
oral-argument-speech-preparation7.pdf or Internet Archive mirror
https://archive.org/details/20240828_20240828_1929 or JusticeForUSWGO.NL mirror for FLAC File (https://justiceforuswgo.nl/audio/20240828104730-O-1415655000323(split).flac) or even the MP3 file (https://justiceforuswgo.nl/audio/20240828104730-O-1415655000323(split).mp3).
Another audio recording source from Supreme Court of Virginia live stream: Internet Archive at the same link has both source recordings. MP3 file (https://justiceforuswgo.nl/audio/2024-08-28%20094530(split).mp3) and FLAC file (https://justiceforuswgo.nl/audio/2024-08-28%20094530(split).flac) at JusticeForUSWGO.NL mirror.
Judge Giles Carter Greer as corrupt as he is, this judge is just a puppet of the Deep State cabal, and the Deep State can now use judges like the one depicted below to target litigants with criminal contempt charges and protecting the prosecution when they violate court orders. Alec Baldwin a presumed-democrat celebrity, who was for gun control, got more justice within the state judicial system than Brian D. Hill ever did within the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Update: August 29, 2024 2:47 AM: The judge is protecting the very same prosecutor (Commonwealth’s Attorney Andy Hall) telling the Virginia State Police that no crimes are being committed against Brian Hill at all, therefore no investigation is ever needed for the State Police to even consider, according to the leaked email from Brian’s mother. See article: LEAK: Commonwealth Attorney Andy Hall BLOCKED any of Brian’s pushes for a criminal investigation by Virginia State Police into the criminal case of Brian D. Hill while this same Commonwealth Attorney destroyed evidence by not marking body-camera footage as evidence – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News. The judge and Commonwealth’s Attorney are corrupt to the core. They are corrupt, crooked, and victimized Brian Hill.
We now are at a very high risk of Virginia courts becoming a dictatorship in Virginia. Originally, courts inherently don’t have criminal contempt powers to arrest whoever they want at their sole discretion unless the Constitution or law gives them that power. That power came from the General Assembly/Legislature branch of the Virginia Constitution. The General Assembly and the U.S. Congress does not have the power/jurisdiction to thwart, or prohibit, or end the freedom of speech. See the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The only exceptions are (1) the clear and present danger threatening to kill somebody and inciting violence and inciting criminal behavior, (2) falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater, and (3) defamation but it has to be pursued by the alleged victim of the defamation and strangers cannot just claim somebody else was defamed in order to take away that person’s free speech. There are some limits, but they are high bar limits. Judge Greer clearly retaliated against Brian Hill over his protected freedom of speech and used the contempt charge to take away his pending appeals before the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Quoted from the oral argument preparation document of what was being argued:
This is very dangerous for our republic. Donald Trump faces the same
dilemma as Appellant. Brian’s procedural due process right has been violated, as
well as his freedom of speech. He didn’t criticize the judge directly to him, but
criticized him in Notices of Appeal to a superior court. The judge clearly retaliated
against the Appellant and attempted to suppress his speech and his appeals which
are clearly illegal, unconstitutional, and unethical with what both the judge and the
Attorney Fred Smith had done. They took away an Appellant’s freedom of speech
and procedural due process of law.
Ignoring or refusing the petition for appeal sends the message to everyone in
Virginia, that a single court judge can now become a dictator of his or her court
and can use dictatorial powers of contempt to suppress both appeals and speech
which is not a clear and present danger. Appellant did not cuss out the judge,
Appellant did not disrupt proceedings, but simply criticized the judge for not
charging the Commonwealth’s Attorney with contempt of court. Instead the judge
charged the critic with criminal contempt instead of the one who’s misconduct isn’t
protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
This is dangerous for our republics of Virginia and America. We need to
preserve and protect our Constitutional God given rights so help me God.
Brian was never accused of defaming Judge Greer and Brian was never a clear and present danger with his statements in his three notices of appeals. Brian’s only supposed crime was criticizing this judge for protecting the prosecutor, protecting the fraud, and allowing the prosecutor to get away with destroying evidence illegally in violation of three court orders for discovery.
People need to understand how dangerous this all is. Everyone in Virginia is at risk of losing their constitutional right to appeals and freedom of speech which gives us the right to simply have a little healthy criticism of our judges and politicians. Appeals are becoming criminalized by highly treasonous local judges in Virginia, a single state court system within the United States of America.
2 thoughts on “Brian D. Hill (USWGO Alt. News) makes oral argument at Virginia Supreme Court on danger of judges being dictators, quashing appeals they don’t like, the danger to freedom of speech #1A”