Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News
Friends of Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News are fighting to expose what happened to Brian a victim of the Federal criminal CABAL. Victim of federal court corruption. (BACKUP SERVER)
Author: Stanley Bolten The Supreme Court of Virginia (SCV) has made a very bad decision for the Constitutional republic of the United States of America. At least in the Commonwealth/State of Virginia. That decision was made on Monday, September 9, 2024. They have refused Brian D. Hill’s (formerly USWGO Alt. News) petition for appeal filed…
Author: Stanley Bolten The FULL Court of Appeals of Virginia has thrown out Brian D. Hill’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. So the full court including all judges there have signed onto a new HORROR, a NEW TYRANNY coming to everybody in Virginia. A single judge is allowed to possibly conspire to have…
Addendums to articles: (1) Possible conspiracy to take away Appellant’s rights to appeal in Virginia had succeeded, Brian D. Hill’s appeals dismissed for untimely filing but files Motion for Delayed Appeals at fault of Attorney Fred Smith – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News; (2) USWGO Brian D. Hill files request for…
URGENT (THIS AFFECTS ALL OF VIRGINIA): Email this and share this article to everyone you know. Start calling the Court of Appeals of Virginia and call for Brian’s right to appeal to be protected. Otherwise, if Brian loses his constitutional right to appeal a corrupt circuit court judge’s ruling, then this can happen to you…
Author: Stanley Bolten Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News had filed a Motion for Sanctions in the Court of Appeals of Virginia against Ashby R. Pritchett of the Circuit Court for the City of Martinsville. As well as additional motions asking to restart two appeals. The reason why is that he had filed…
The Office of the Attorney General of Virginia has filed a “defective” brief, as Brian’s labels the Appellee’s brief in opposition to Brian D. Hill’s two pending appeals. Brian D. Hill is formerly USWGO Alternative News. The two pending appeals concern two court orders denying Brian’s motion for either a judgment of acquittal or motion for a new trial by jury. This is within the Court of Appeals of Virginia, a state court. The Attorney General’s opposition brief argued that if Brian proves destruction of Brady material evidence by the Commonwealth Attorney or Martinsville Police Department, then it would be considered intrinsic fraud which could “obscure” the alleged “facts” of guilt presented to a jury. When a party does not comply with multiple court orders, it is usually a contempt of court. When a party fails or refuses to comply with court orders for discovery material, the judge can decide to allow the adverse party in a case to push for an “adverse inference” allowing a jury to be instructed on the fact of destruction of evidence by the government prosecutor favorable to the other party in a criminal case or civil case. Usually destruction of evidence is a sign that the case prosecuted may have been a weak or unfounded case.
hat Brian pays this corrupt (probably compromised) lawyer and the appeals were all thrown out. They did this probably to retaliate against Brian for his allegations insinuating that the judges of this Court may or may not have been blackmailed with child rape and murder as Attorney L. Lin Wood’s vague tweets could be saying regarding any or certain number of politicians and judges, but no names have come out of which judges could have been compromised and blackmailed. That corrupt Court of Appeals didn’t even respond to Brian’s allegations, which that right there is suspicious, there needs to be investigations and removals from office. That is why special counsel is necessary to investigate every state and federal Judge who may have been blackmailed or threatened. Investigations may be needed to investigate every judge of this Court of Appeals, they act just as corrupt as the Federal Courts.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news had filed his first direct appeal brief for his state criminal case in the Court of Appeals of Virginia. He had cited evidence filed in his case in Circuit Court proving that he was not medically and psychologically cleared on September 21, 2018. This disproves the element of the Martinsville Police criminal charge against him made on September 21, 2018. This can help prove his actual innocence. Also his appeal demonstrates that he never actually plead guilty at all. The Judge struck the words plead guilty as the Judge even knew at the time that Brian never said he was guilty and never thought that Brian was guilty but his lawyer was so ineffective that he had to technically convict Brian even though Brian never plead guilty.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news had filed a letter with the Court of Appeals in Virginia asking for transcripts from Martinsville Circuit Court. In that letter he decided to paste some censored Tweet screenshots from L. Lin Wood in January, about judges and politicians being blackmailed with child rape and murder. Is he essentially accusing the Judge in Martinsville, Giles Carter Greer and any or all Virginia Judges of being possibly a blackmailed Judge? He is putting out the information about this and this will likely stir up anybody who was ever blackmailed by the U.S. intelligence agencies as attorney Lin Wood had spoken of. Whether he is or isn’t, Brian is wasting no time filing the information on the state court record system with the Lin Wood tweets.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news, files his petition for rehearing in the corrupt “Fourth Circuit” “U.S. Court of Appeals”, in their bid to wrongfully dismiss his writ of habeas corpus through his 2255 motion, again citing that actual innocence overcomes any procedural bars including the one-year statute of limitations. This petition was timely filed. The opinion of this corrupt panel of appellate judges proves that they have completely ignored the very issue and the merits of Brian’s “ACTUAL INNOCENCE” claim, and their case law only replies upon the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act [AEDPA] strict limitations law forbidding Brian from filing his writ of habeas corpus after one year from the final judgment of criminal conviction. However Brian filed in both his appeal brief and in his 2255 motion case that “actual innocence” is not subject to a one year time-bar. The “Fourth Circuit” judges have completely ignored Brian’s actual innocence and dismissed his appeal case by claiming it was procedurally dismissed as time barred.