Tag U.S. Court of Appeals
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO Alternative News had gotten more bolder in filing a pleading in Federal U.S. Court of Appeals accusing Federal Judges of being blackmailed with child rape and murder, that Attorney L. Lin Wood is the source of this information. He has finally gotten more bolder as this is the third Court system of him bringing up the allegations of Judges being blackmailed with child rape and murder. First was the Federal Court in Roanoke, VA under the Chief Judge Francis Urbanski, second was a letter filed with the Court of Appeals of Virginia which is a State Appeals Court (not Federal), and the third is now this recent filing. Brian is asking for the Judicial Council of the Fourth Circuit to investigate the blackmail evidence, and subpoena Lin Wood to determine if Judge William Lindsey Osteen Junior and / or Thomas David Schroeder were ever targets of the blackmail scheme. If this is ever proven true, then Brian is entitled to either a New Trial in his Federal Criminal case or complete acquittal and removal from the Sex Offender Registry as a wrongfully convicted innocent man and was a victim of an partial corrupt Federal Judge who was blackmailed with child rape to prevent Brian from ever receiving a fair and impartial administration of justice. Essentially Brian would be deprived of Due Process of Law under the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Brian D. Hill, formerly of USWGO alternative news, files his petition for rehearing in the corrupt “Fourth Circuit” “U.S. Court of Appeals”, in their bid to wrongfully dismiss his writ of habeas corpus through his 2255 motion, again citing that actual innocence overcomes any procedural bars including the one-year statute of limitations. This petition was timely filed. The opinion of this corrupt panel of appellate judges proves that they have completely ignored the very issue and the merits of Brian’s “ACTUAL INNOCENCE” claim, and their case law only replies upon the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act [AEDPA] strict limitations law forbidding Brian from filing his writ of habeas corpus after one year from the final judgment of criminal conviction. However Brian filed in both his appeal brief and in his 2255 motion case that “actual innocence” is not subject to a one year time-bar. The “Fourth Circuit” judges have completely ignored Brian’s actual innocence and dismissed his appeal case by claiming it was procedurally dismissed as time barred.