Compromised and BLACKMAILED U.S. SUPREME COURT denied Certiorari for Raland Brunson case; and Attorney Robert Thomas III lied about the Brunson case being “accepted by the Supremes”

Author: Stanley Bolten

When my source or sources burn me by giving me false information, I will not tolerate it. I was convinced based on this Attorney that the Raland Brunson case was accepted by the Supremes. I did not lie in my article: Exclusive: BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court accepted the Raland Brunson case, the Supremes accepted the case (Source is redacted to protect source) – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News. I did not lie because this source was an attorney and he was the one who filed the amicus briefs in the Brunson case. I thought I could trust his word since he tried to file an amicus brief for Paul Preston & New California State. I thought he was an ally to the Brunson brothers. I never lied to the people, Robert Thomas III lied to me and when I mirrored his claim to all of you, essentially he lied to me an ally of the Brunson case, and that means this attorney indirectly lied to all of you that the Brunson case was accepted by the Supremes. He lied or he was wrong. This is inappropriate behavior for a lawyer to lie about the Brunson case being accepted.

Here is my source, a screenshot and the link to the unredacted email pdf file below. I always tell the truth. I actually knew the Brunson case would be rejected because of my dealing with the case of Brian David Hill v. United States of America. He filed six different petitions and three petitions for rehearing. All of them were denied and rejected. I already knew the Brunson case would be rejected but I wanted to believe this lawyer: Robert Thomas III. I wanted to believe him when he said the Brunson case was accepted by the Supremes but he let me down, he let us all down. He probably spread that disinformation to me so that opposition wouldn’t build, knowing I would tell other people what that lawyer told me. I have articles where I told people that I believe the Brunson case would fail because Chief Justice John Roberts is BLACKMAILED, he is compromised. See article: Stanley Bolten on Truth Social: The Raland J. Brunson case (No. 22-380) may be dismissed, Writ of Certiorari petition denied because we have seen six cases in Brian Hill v. United States being denied after each U.S. Solicitor General’s waiver of right to respond; John Roberts is compromised, blackmailed, and corrupt, he will never allow this case to proceed – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News. I was right on my original assessment of how CORRUPT the U.S. SUPREME COURT is, they are CORRUPT. I was wrong to trust that attorney to tell me that the Brunson case was accepted, I was right at the very beginning when I said Certiorari will be denied. Now you all get it.

Photograph of the attempted filed amicus brief in the Raland Brunson case. Here is the proof. http://web.archive.org/web/20230107001408/https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/251198/20221231133825179_Supplemental%20Amicus_2022-12-31.pdf and http://web.archive.org/web/20230105232257/https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html

Here is the non-redacted email: Roundcube Webmail Re For Amicus filers, a SCOTUS case as important as Brunson case.pdf

I knew Certiorari would be denied for the Brunson case because they are against the Anti-Christ, they are against the New World Order and it’s beast system. So was Brian D. Hill of formerly USWGO Alternative News. I will list links to all six Supreme Court petitions Brian Hill had filed and every one of them were denied. Check every one of them. Now seven petitions were denied, three petitions for rehearing in the case of Brian David Hill. That makes ten petitions had failed. If Brian files a petition for rehearing for the blackmail scheme case, they will deny it too because they are corrupt, the Supreme Court is CORRUPT.

 Docket for 22-6123
Title:Brian David Hill, Petitioner v. United States
BrianDavidHill, Petitioner United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed Party name: BrianDavidHill
 Docket for 21-6036
Title:Brian David Hill, Petitioner v. United States
BrianDavidHill, Petitioner United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed Party name: BrianDavidHill
 Docket for 21-6037
Title:Brian David Hill, Petitioner v. United States
BrianDavidHill, Petitioner United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed Party name: BrianDavidHill
 Docket for 21-6038
Title:In Re Brian David Hill, Petitioner
In Re BrianDavidHill, Petitioner Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
 Docket for 20-7763
Title:Brian David Hill, Petitioner v. Virginia
BrianDavidHill, Petitioner Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021) Party name: BrianDavidHill

 Docket for 20-6864
Title:Brian David Hill, Petitioner v. United States
BrianDavidHill, Petitioner United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due
 Docket for 19-8684
Title:Brian David Hill, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, BrianDavidHill. Party name: BrianDavidHill