IMPORTANT: See how the International Deep State is holding people hostage, holding us under siege, and is our enemy. Please like, subscribe, and share this important documentary hopefully after reading the important article: https://rumble.com/v2ozhp6-the-deep-state-can-frame-you-the-documentary.html
Author: Stanley Bolten
A private company can now block any and every email to any member and staff person working for the U.S. House of Representatives also called the U.S. Congress. Microsoft operates the email services of all staff people and every member who works for the U.S. Congress. Doesn’t matter that it says mail.house.gov. All emails are routed through Microsoft, through “ushouse.onmicrosoft.com”. Admins can create custom flow rules to block email messages if it meets whatever criteria flags such email without any oversight since Microsoft is a private corporation and isn’t considered a Government entity. So now the top levels of U.S. Congress have created a flow rule, a system to block emails from their Congress members. Now folks will have to find private and personal email addresses of U.S. Congresspeople or will have to mail to their offices or use FAX Machines to get around the censorship and blocking conducted by Microsoft Servers and Artificial Intelligence (AI). I have already had to use rocketreach.co to find Marjorie Taylor Greene’s personal contact email to email her the evidence since Microsoft is blocking her staff from receiving it at her Congressional offices.
It was November 11, 2023, an email with evidence PDF files and a few links (explaining how it allows the staff person to access more evidence) was sent to U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz about the mistreatment of Jonathon Owen Shroyer; and how he was being mistreated in the corrupt federal judicial system by a corrupt Federal Judge. That email from StanleyBolten[@]justiceforuswgo.nl was blocked by a hidden flow rule. So Protonmail was used to attempt to get around the blocking of that email, and the second email through protonmail was also blocked by that same rule. So Artificial Intelligence or machine learning may be used to block emails to staff members of U.S. Congresspeople. The “ADMINS” make the decision to block emails from any person sending an email to their Congresspeople. This also may mean emails could be blocked when using their official contact forms for sending emails too, since Microsoft is filtering any emails which get targeted by the custom flow rule. So if you try to direct a Congressperson to look at evidence PDF files by links since their forms won’t allow sending attachments, it will likely be blocked by Microsoft too. Was the new Speaker of the House named Mike Johnson behind this or was Kevin McCarthy the former House Speaker behind this??? It would be up to the Speaker of the House to initiate email filtering policy and rules. It would be up to them to have Microsoft host or manage or filter any or every email to U.S. Congress.
IS CONGRESS UNDER SIEGE BY MICROSOFT??? IS CONGRESS UNDER SIEGE??? DOES WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM HOLD CONGRESS UNDER SIEGE???
See the proof from article: Public email to U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz @mattgaetz with evidence for him re: Jonathon Owen Shroyer (Email blocked by Microsoft email servers operating U.S. House of Representatives email system) – Justice for Brian D. Hill of USWGO Alternative News.
FILES proving email was blocked from even getting to staff of Matt Gaetz:
1. Undeliverable Evidence Information for you re Jonathon Owen Shroyer.pdf – Email to Matt Gaetz was blocked by Microsoft email servers and possibly by using Artificial Intelligence (AI). What is Microsoft a private corporation doing hosting the email servers for every member and staff person of U.S. Congress??? Microsoft is violating my First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution right to freedom of speech and petitioning the government for a redress of grievances by blocking my email to a U.S. Congressperson. Tried a different email provider such as creating a new protonmail account and it was blocked there too. So Microsoft is using AI to block my evidence from reaching Congressional staffers.
2. Roundcube Webmail Undeliverable Evidence Information for you re Jonathon Owen Shroyer.pdf – Email to Matt Gaetz was blocked by Microsoft email servers and possibly by using Artificial Intelligence (AI). What is Microsoft a private corporation doing hosting the email servers for every member and staff person of U.S. Congress??? Microsoft is violating my First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution right to freedom of speech and petitioning the government for a redress of grievances by blocking my email to a U.S. Congressperson.
3. Roundcube Webmail Evidence Information for you re Jonathon Owen Shroyer.pdf – Printout of the very email blocked by Microsoft and possibly Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Why is Microsoft blocking and filtering emails to U.S. Congress??? Why doesn’t Microsoft have an appeal mechanism to appeal the decision to block the email and have it manually reviewed then allow the email??? Why is a private company or corporation managing the emails of the U.S. Congress??? Doesn’t this not violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution for a private company to engage in censorship when managing the entire emails of U.S. Congress and staffers??? What happened to freedom of speech, freedom of press, and the right to send evidence documents to Congress. An article was published at Before It’s News because this is a very concerning state of developments going on here.
Evidence Information for you re: Jonathon Owen Shroyer
From Stanley Bolten <stanleybolten@justiceforuswgo.nl> To <FL01MG.Outreach@mail.house.gov>, <info@mattgaetz.com>, <info@mattgaetzforflorida.com>, <matt@gaetz4usa.com>, <Team@gaetz4usa.com>, <campaign@mattgaetzforflorida.com>, <team@gaetz4congress.com> Date 2023-11-11 00:31 Priority Highest U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz,
I have documentation, evidence, and information for you since you work directly for U.S. Congressman Matt Gaetz as he is looking into or investigating the mistreatment of Jonathon Owen Shroyer at the Federal Correctional Institution 1 in Oakdale, LA.
I have the evidence regarding the differential treatment of J6 defendant Jonathon Owen Shroyer not just by the U.S. DOJ but also by the judge presiding over Owen Shroyer’s case. DOJ deleted emails regarding the attempted filed sentencing letter, and didn’t even want to look it over or investigate any of it’s claims despite being a Declaration/affidavit. You may want to bring up this issue on Twitter or even on the Congressional record if you want to bring public attention to it; or keep the attached documents of this email, download the rest of the evidence from the blog links to dozens and more of evidence documents and phone call recordings legal under one party consent. The corruption documented for any member of Congress to use in investigation of the issues of unethical misconduct within the DOJ and Federal Judiciary in it’s mistreatment of J6 defendants. Evidence of a sentencing letter being covered up illegally by the court. Then when the letter writer contacted the U.S. Probation Office in Austin, TX regarding covered up sentencing letter, and the BOP facility received a copy of the sentencing letter by certified mail, the judge was forced to acknowledge receipt but denied it and never informed the letter writer that it was denied. The letter was never returned to the filer after it was denied, the court never contacted the letter write informing him that his filing was rejected. The letter was covered up again, meaning they had to cover up the first cover up by having a denial of filing filed on docket but still cover up the filing. Laws are possibly being broken and/or constitutional violations by a rigged judiciary over the January 6, 2021 incident.
1. Evidence has been released to the general public on justiceforuswgo.nl of a timely filed sentencing letter mailed through USPS Express Mail. Also there was a re-filing of the sentencing letter. It was mailed, twice. It was an affidavit sentencing letter demonstrating character witness testimony of the January 6 defendant Owen Shroyer being a good person and being a professional news reporter or journalist. Filing of this letter would have demonstrated that Owen’s professional behavior is protecting him as the “Free Press” under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The DOJ and judge covered up the sentencing letter from the Court and deleted it from DOJ emails to prevent Owen from being recognized as a Free Press protected individual and thus shouldn’t be sitting in solitary confinement. These are illegal and unconstitutional activities going on to ensure the torture of news reporter Shroyer. The evidence is all in PDF files and is publicly accessible for the general public: https://justiceforuswgo.nl/blog/2023/11/04/positive-sentencing-letter-for-j6-defendant-owen-shroyer-was-denied-months-after-being-timely-filed-not-covered-up-anymore-other-fed-judges-granted-filing-of-sentencing-letters-incl-j6-defendant-s.html and https://justiceforuswgo.nl/blog/2023/10/06/brian-d-hill-refiles-mails-sentencing-letter-again-in-owen-shroyer-j6-federal-case-asks-clerk-to-notify-brian-if-it-is-approved-to-be-considered-as-timely-filed-around-september-11-2023-a-day-befor/.
2. I have evidence that Joe Hoft of The Gateway Pundit released a post about the judge denying the sentencing letter favorable to the January 6 defendant, the judge saying the public has no right to file anything on criminal docket which includes sentencing letters favorable to the January 6 defendant. However the same U.S. District Court in Washington, DC allows sentencing letters in other federal criminal cases. Roger Stone’s case a democrat judge Amy B. Jackson allowed sentencing letters, and J6 defendant Stewart Rhodes a negative sentencing letter was allowed to be filed by another democrat federal judge. For some reason, this particular sentencing letter was blocked even when the affidavit stated how he was a character witness of Owen Shroyer under penalty of perjury. Usually the standard for a judge to accept filing a sentencing letter for a criminal defendant is by demonstrating how you know the defendant and/or personally witnessed how he treated the person. Brian shown a photo of Brian, Alex Jones, and Stewart Rhodes proving that he knew the boss of Owen Shroyer, Brian was introduced when calling into Owen’s talk show. Brian demonstrated evidence in his sentencing letter affidavit how he knew the defendant enough to be a character witness, but it was still denied and covered up again (filer was not notified by mail or anything about his filing being rejected, not even the clerk is sending any notification) saying the public has no right to file anything including sentencing letters. For some odd or unknown reason, Owen Shroyer is not allowed any sentencing letter from any character witness if it is favorable to him. That right there means a bias or prejudice against him by the judge which is unethical. https://joehoft.com/dc-court-wont-allow-sentencing-letters-for-owen-shroyer-but-will-for-serial-rapist/
3. I am aware that the court isn’t even writing back the letter writer Brian Hill informing him that his sentencing letter was denied leave to file. This contradicts normal judicial procedures that a federal judge silently denies the sentencing letter and doesn’t even write back the attempted filer to even inform him of it being denied. Everything is being done secretly. Brian called the judge’s chambers and his clerk told Brian that he isn’t even allowed to know if they received his letter. Other judge’s chambers have not done such a thing. This is a very secretive courthouse. They are treating Owen Shroyer as a GITMO detainee where Brian’s sentencing letter can be secretly rejected and destroyed because Owen may be classified as a terrorist.
I can’t put too many links in this email or it will get blocked or filtered, but the evidence can be researched at the small number of links and evidence can be collected by Matt Gaetz or anybody he has assigned to investigate what has happened to Owen Shroyer. The judge is acting weird, the DOJ is deleting emails without even reviewing over the affidavit or anything, and the prison is blocking books directly from the publisher. I have even more evidence if you want to request it. You won’t need to subpoena me as I will voluntarily hand over any further evidence you may want to request.
Thank you for looking out for Jonathon Owen Shroyer. Evidence is everything, proofs are everything. You should have more evidence for any investigation into Owen Shroyer’s mistreatment by the Feds.
God Bless You,
Stanley Bolten